- Originally given a 15 rating by the BBFC
- Due to scenes where Logue encourages the King to shout profanities to relieve stress
- Salt and Casino Royale both include torture scenes yet are 12As
- Following Hooper's criticism the board lowered the rating to a 12A
- Motion Picture Association of America gave the film an R rating - have to be 17 or accompanied by an adult
- Harvey Weinstein, the producer, said he was considering having the film re-edited to remove some of the profanity, so that it would receive a lower classification and reach a larger audience
- Tom Hooper refused to cute the film although he considered covering the swear words with bleeps
- Helena Bonham Carter also defended the film saying the film is not violent and is full of humanity and wit
- Firth noted that the context of the use wasn't offensive
- An alternate version with the profanities muted out of the soundtrack was classified PG-13 by the MPAA, this version will be released to theatres across the US, replacing the R-rated cut.
- Distributed by Transmission in Australia, Momentum Pictures in the UK, the Weinstein Company in North America
UK Film Industry
Monday, 7 March 2011
Wikipedia Summary of Release
Guardian Article Extract
(TheGuardian) has often had cause to quote the "10% rule", which suggests that the UK gross of a film in sterling will usually be around a 10th of the US figure in dollars.
The King's Speech
Guardian > Film > Culture > The King's Speech
Click here for full Guardian article
Click here for full Guardian article
- Distributed by Momentum Pictures
- £3.52 million opening weekend
- Slumdog Millionaire £1.83 million
- The UK film council financially backed the King's Speech
- Funded by 6 independent financial bodies as opposed to large studies e.g. Universal - lacked brand recognition
Key to making a film a success:
- Marathon publicity
- Strong critical support
- Bold positioning by distributors
Monday, 22 November 2010
Funding Structures: Investors' Returns:
- Difficult to predict
- Need to find other ways of ensuring investor getting money back
- If market unpredictable (as it is at present) it is even more difficult
Funding Structures: Guaranteeing Success/Reducing the Risk
- Prequel/sequel
- Known director/scriptwriter/stars
- Develop from existing format (novel, etc)
- Huge budget (can itself, create a 'buzz')
- Early teaser strategy established
- Release date scheduled carefully (Christmas, summer holiday, halloween etc)
- Avoid 'duplication' of similar genre released at same time (often impossible to know for sure)
UK and US Funding Structures: Initial Issues
- Initial investment: A company, its machinery, sites and personnel have to be 'set up'
- The demand and supply must be 'constant' (you can't have workers being idle - it costs too much)
- Market research has to be paid for, the company need to know that the product is 'liked' by its customers
- Advertising and marketing must be employed (print, moving-image, radio and e-media) to keep the 'buzz' about the product going, therefore, keeping sales at a maximum
- Industry factors are not fixed; they cannot be accurately predicted; tastes change and this can be disastrous
- Staffing costs in the movie industry are huge as is the race to develop new technologies; this can cripple companies
- The key word (in any company but very much in the film industry) is RISK
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)